[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491b0e5d86798242ff0ff2cdea44588c50ae9a77.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:47:33 +0000
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: contacts for the gfs2 tree
Hi,
On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 23:18 +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 9:40 PM Stephen Rothwell
> <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I noticed commit
> >
> > 2e6ef8aaba6b ("Remove myself as maintainer of GFS2")
> >
> > Currently I have
> >
> > Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
> > Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
> >
> > listed as the only contacts for the gfs2 tree.
> >
> > Should I change that to
> >
> > Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
> >
> > or keep Steven (even though he is not listed in MAINTAINERS)? And
> > should
> > I add the mailing list as well?
>
> I think it would make sense to put me in instead of Bob. Steve hasn't
> been working on the actual code for a while -- even though he remains
> a valuable source of information for GFS2 -- so I don't think he will
> object to being removed here.
>
> For the time being, I will be the only person screwing up the
> upstream
> gfs2 repository, so I'll also be the person to fix things up again.
> In
> that context, would it make sense to add the gfs2 list? Is this what
> you would commonly do?
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
Yes, I'm not likely to be working on the code again, so it definitely
makes sense to remove me from that list,
Steve.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists