[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871qcqqa1k.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:15:03 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of
IOSF GPIO
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> Ok, this now has been testen on both a BYT and a CHT device which
> actually use GPIO controls in their MIPI sequences so this
> series is:
>
> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>
> And the code of the entire series also looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>
> for the series.
Thanks Andy & Hans!
I'll merge this once the test results are in. The BAT results have been
a bit flaky recently, so needed to do a rerun.
That said, I'm not sure if we have any hardware in CI that would
actually exercise the modifications, so in that sense I trust Hans'
testing much more.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists