[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVfVsVDQ9j7nMsnW@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:05:53 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of
IOSF GPIO
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Ok, this now has been testen on both a BYT and a CHT device which
> > actually use GPIO controls in their MIPI sequences so this
> > series is:
> >
> > Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> >
> > And the code of the entire series also looks good to me:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> >
> > for the series.
>
> Thanks Andy & Hans!
>
> I'll merge this once the test results are in. The BAT results have been
> a bit flaky recently, so needed to do a rerun.
>
> That said, I'm not sure if we have any hardware in CI that would
> actually exercise the modifications, so in that sense I trust Hans'
> testing much more.
Thank you!
Should I fix checkpatch warnings CI reported about?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists