linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/191] 5.10.201-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:11:14 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/191] 5.10.201-rc1 review

On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 06:43, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On 11/15/23 12:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.201 release.
> > There are 191 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:46:03 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
>         total: 159 pass: 155 fail: 4
> Failed builds:
>         arm:allmodconfig
>         arm64:allmodconfig
>         i386:tools/perf
>         x86_64:tools/perf
> Qemu test results:
>         total: 495 pass: 495 fail: 0
>
> with:
>
> Building arm64:allmodconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c:6:10: fatal error: linux/args.h: No such file or directory
>
> There is no linux/args.h in v5.10.y.
>
> Caused by "interconnect: qcom: osm-l3: Replace custom implementation of COUNT_ARGS()".
>
> Also:
>
> Building i386:tools/perf ... failed
>
> util/evlist.c: In function ‘evlist__add_aux_dummy’:
> util/evlist.c:269:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘evlist__dummy_event’; did you mean ‘evsel__is_dummy_event’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     269 |  struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
>         |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         |                        evsel__is_dummy_event
> util/evlist.c:269:24: error: initialization of ‘struct evsel *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
>
> There is indeed no 'evlist__dummy_event' function in v5.10.y.
>
> This is with v5.10.200-192-g550b7e1fee20. I am a bit puzzled why others
> don't seem to see those problems.

Thanks for reporting allmodconfig build failures.

My apologies.
The LKFT found allmodconfig failure lately due to infra issues / timeouts,
the builds have been re-triggered manually.

        arm:allmodconfig - FAILED
        arm64:allmodconfig - FAILED

LKFT have stopped building perf on 5.x and 4.x branches, because we
reported several perf build issues and were not solved in the past.

However, building perf tests from recent stable branches and testing
that on older
stable-rc branches.

- Naresh