linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/191] 5.10.201-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 06:58:18 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/191] 5.10.201-rc1 review

On 11/16/23 23:41, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 06:43, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/15/23 12:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.201 release.
>>> There are 191 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:46:03 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>>          total: 159 pass: 155 fail: 4
>> Failed builds:
>>          arm:allmodconfig
>>          arm64:allmodconfig
>>          i386:tools/perf
>>          x86_64:tools/perf
>> Qemu test results:
>>          total: 495 pass: 495 fail: 0
>>
>> with:
>>
>> Building arm64:allmodconfig ... failed
>> --------------
>> Error log:
>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c:6:10: fatal error: linux/args.h: No such file or directory
>>
>> There is no linux/args.h in v5.10.y.
>>
>> Caused by "interconnect: qcom: osm-l3: Replace custom implementation of COUNT_ARGS()".
>>
>> Also:
>>
>> Building i386:tools/perf ... failed
>>
>> util/evlist.c: In function ‘evlist__add_aux_dummy’:
>> util/evlist.c:269:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘evlist__dummy_event’; did you mean ‘evsel__is_dummy_event’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>      269 |  struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
>>          |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>          |                        evsel__is_dummy_event
>> util/evlist.c:269:24: error: initialization of ‘struct evsel *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
>>
>> There is indeed no 'evlist__dummy_event' function in v5.10.y.
>>
>> This is with v5.10.200-192-g550b7e1fee20. I am a bit puzzled why others
>> don't seem to see those problems.
> 
> Thanks for reporting allmodconfig build failures.
> 
> My apologies.
> The LKFT found allmodconfig failure lately due to infra issues / timeouts,
> the builds have been re-triggered manually.
> 
>          arm:allmodconfig - FAILED
>          arm64:allmodconfig - FAILED
> 
> LKFT have stopped building perf on 5.x and 4.x branches, because we
> reported several perf build issues and were not solved in the past.
> 

Kind of makes (sad) sense; after all, I had stopped building perf on
4.14.y as well for the same reason. I'll do the same for 4.19.y and
for all 5.x branches.

Guenter