[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f14aab8-a5bb-4af4-9475-afe6b678a7fd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 20:56:47 +0100
From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: qcom: qcm: fix unused
qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist
On 11/20/23 19:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> For !OF builds, the qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist is unused:
>
> drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c:1652:34: error: ‘qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
>
> Fixes: 00b1248606ba ("firmware: qcom_scm: Add support for Qualcomm Secure Execution Environment SCM interface")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311191654.S4wlVUrz-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
> index 520de9b5633a..ecdb367dc9b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
> @@ -1649,7 +1649,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_scm_qseecom_app_send);
> * We do not yet support re-entrant calls via the qseecom interface. To prevent
> + any potential issues with this, only allow validated machines for now.
> */
> -static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist[] __maybe_unused = {
> { .compatible = "lenovo,thinkpad-x13s", },
> { }
> };
Thanks! Given that we're right now only allowing qseecom clients to load
on devices within that list, maybe it would be cleaner to make
QCOM_QSEECOM depend on OF explicitly instead?
Anyway, I'm also fine with this solution.
Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists