linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: x86/sm2 -add Zhaoxin SM2 algorithm implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49da551d-a43c-48b8-af31-965103a390ec@zhaoxin.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:04:19 +0800
From:   LeoLiu-oc <leoliu-oc@...oxin.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
        <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <seanjc@...gle.com>, <kim.phillips@....com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        <babu.moger@....com>, <jiaxi.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        <jmattson@...gle.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>, <CobeChen@...oxin.com>,
        <TonyWWang@...oxin.com>, <YunShen@...oxin.com>,
        <Leoliu@...oxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: x86/sm2 -add Zhaoxin SM2 algorithm
 implementation



在 2023/11/16 3:21, Dave Hansen 写道:
> 
>> vim +/asm +43 arch/x86/crypto/sm2-zhaoxin-gmi_glue.c
>>
>>      35	
>>      36	/* Zhaoxin sm2 verify function */
>>      37	static inline int zhaoxin_gmi_sm2_verify(unsigned char *key, unsigned char *hash, unsigned char *sig,
>>      38					unsigned char *scratch)
>>      39	{
>>      40		uint64_t cword, f_ok;
>>      41		cword = (uint64_t)0x8;
>>      42	
>>    > 43		asm(".byte 0xf2, 0x0f, 0xa6, 0xc0"
>>      44			:"=c"(f_ok), "+a"(hash), "+b"(key), "+d"(cword), "+S"(scratch), "+D"(sig));
>>      45	
>>      46		return f_ok;
>>      47	}
>>      48	
> 
> When you go fix your compile error, can you please look around the tree
> and see what folks do for replacing .byte?  AS_SHA1_NI, for example.

Thank you for your advice. We have found the root cause of the compile 
error and conducted detailed testing again. A corrected version will be 
released soon.

Sincerely.
Leoliu-oc