linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] drm/modes: Fix divide error in drm_mode_debug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87edgjo422.fsf@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:20:53 +0200
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>
Cc:     airlied@...ux.ie, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        melissa.srw@...il.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
        daniel.vetter@...el.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        syzbot+2e93e6fb36e6fdc56574@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
        Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
        Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] drm/modes: Fix divide error in
 drm_mode_debug_printmodeline

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:41:18PM +0800, Edward Adam Davis wrote:
>> [Syz Log]
>> divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
>> CPU: 0 PID: 5068 Comm: syz-executor357 Not tainted 6.6.0-syzkaller-16039-gac347a0655db #0
>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023
>> RIP: 0010:drm_mode_vrefresh drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c:1303 [inline]
>> RIP: 0010:drm_mode_debug_printmodeline+0x118/0x4e0 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c:60
>> Code: 00 41 0f b7 07 66 83 f8 02 b9 01 00 00 00 0f 43 c8 0f b7 c1 0f af e8 44 89 f0 48 69 c8 e8 03 00 00 89 e8 d1 e8 48 01 c8 31 d2 <48> f7 f5 49 89 c6 eb 0c e8 fb 07 66 fc eb 05 e8 f4 07 66 fc 48 89
>> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000391f8d0 EFLAGS: 00010246
>> RAX: 000000000001f400 RBX: ffff888025045000 RCX: 000000000001f400
>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000008000 RDI: ffff888025045018
>> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8528b9af R09: 0000000000000000
>> R10: ffffc9000391f8a0 R11: fffff52000723f17 R12: 0000000000000080
>> R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000080 R15: ffff888025045016
>> FS:  0000555556932380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> CR2: 00000000005fdeb8 CR3: 000000007fcff000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> Call Trace:
>>  <TASK>
>>  drm_mode_setcrtc+0x83b/0x1880 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c:794
>>  drm_ioctl_kernel+0x362/0x500 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:792
>>  drm_ioctl+0x636/0xb00 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:895
>>  vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
>>  __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
>>  __se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
>>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
>>  do_syscall_64+0x44/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
>>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
>> 
>> [Analysis]
>> When calculating den in drm_mode_vrefresh(), if the vscan value is too large, 
>> there is a probability of unsigned integer overflow.
>> 
>> [Fix]
>> Before multiplying by vscan, first check if their product will overflow. 
>> If overflow occurs, return 0 and exit the subsequent process.
>> 
>> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+2e93e6fb36e6fdc56574@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Fixes: ea40d7857d52 ("drm/vkms: fbdev emulation support")
>> Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 7 +++++--
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> index ac9a406250c5..60739d861da2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/list.h>
>>  #include <linux/list_sort.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
>>  
>>  #include <video/of_display_timing.h>
>>  #include <video/of_videomode.h>
>> @@ -1297,8 +1298,10 @@ int drm_mode_vrefresh(const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>>  		num *= 2;
>>  	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN)
>>  		den *= 2;
>> -	if (mode->vscan > 1)
>> -		den *= mode->vscan;
>> +	if (mode->vscan > 1) {
>> +		if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(den, mode->vscan, &den)))
>> +			return 0;
>> +	}
>
> I can't see any driver that actually supports vscan>1. Only
> nouveau has some code for it, but doesn't look like it does
> anything sensible. All other drivers for sure should be
> rejecting vscan>1 outright. Which driver is this?
>
> Is there an actual usecase where nouveau needs this (and does
> it even work?) or could we just rip out the whole thing and
> reject vscan>1 globally?

I thought the whole thing seemed familiar [1].

BR,
Jani.



[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802174746.2256-1-astrajoan@yahoo.com


>
>>  
>>  	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(mul_u32_u32(num, 1000), den);
>>  }
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel