[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ee13525-74d1-4308-b7b5-c01daa5352e2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:54:34 +0100
From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: qcom: qcm: fix unused
qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist
Am 11/21/2023 um 8:07 AM schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 20/11/2023 20:56, Maximilian Luz wrote:
>> On 11/20/23 19:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> For !OF builds, the qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist is unused:
>>>
>>> drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c:1652:34: error: ‘qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
>>>
>>> Fixes: 00b1248606ba ("firmware: qcom_scm: Add support for Qualcomm Secure Execution Environment SCM interface")
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311191654.S4wlVUrz-lkp@intel.com/
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
>>> index 520de9b5633a..ecdb367dc9b8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
>>> @@ -1649,7 +1649,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_scm_qseecom_app_send);
>>> * We do not yet support re-entrant calls via the qseecom interface. To prevent
>>> + any potential issues with this, only allow validated machines for now.
>>> */
>>> -static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist[] = {
>>> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist[] __maybe_unused = {
>>> { .compatible = "lenovo,thinkpad-x13s", },
>>> { }
>>> };
>>
>> Thanks! Given that we're right now only allowing qseecom clients to load
>> on devices within that list, maybe it would be cleaner to make
>> QCOM_QSEECOM depend on OF explicitly instead?
>
> There is no code dependency here.
Which is why I'm fine with this as well. It would just drop
currently unused code on !OF configs.
> The driver should already depend on
> ARCH_QCOM which select OF. Are you saying it does not depend on
> ARCH_QCOM? Why?
QCOM_QSEECOM depends only on QCOM_SCM. QCOM_SCM does not have
any dependencies. Instead, it is selected by ARCH_QCOM.
Best regards,
Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists