[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mc_KAX0QWSoL9UEwwjFCD=fHv6ydceSYwaY91C=RkURxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:57:07 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeprom: at24: use of_match_ptr()
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 17:41, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> 2023-11-22 at 16:59, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > - .of_match_table = at24_of_match,
> > + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(at24_of_match),
>
> If you do that, you will need to also add #ifdef CONFIG_OF around the
> at24_of_match definition, of you'll trigger a warning about an unused
> const variable (for some configs). I think.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
Nope, no warnings even with W=2. This is true for unused functions but
unused data structures are just silently removed.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists