linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net/smc: compatible with 128-bits extend GID of virtual ISM device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 19:07:25 +0000
From:   Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To:     Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     wintera@...ux.ibm.com, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
        alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com, tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com,
        raspl@...ux.ibm.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net/smc: compatible with 128-bits extend
 GID of virtual ISM device

On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 09:57:55PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
> According to virtual ISM support feature defined by SMCv2.1, GIDs of
> virtual ISM device are UUIDs defined by RFC4122, which are 128-bits
> long. So some adaptation work is required. And note that the GIDs of
> existing platform firmware ISM devices still remain 64-bits long.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>

...

> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c

...

> @@ -1522,7 +1527,10 @@ void smc_smcd_terminate(struct smcd_dev *dev, u64 peer_gid, unsigned short vlan)
>  	/* run common cleanup function and build free list */
>  	spin_lock_bh(&dev->lgr_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(lgr, l, &dev->lgr_list, list) {
> -		if ((!peer_gid || lgr->peer_gid == peer_gid) &&
> +		if ((!peer_gid->gid ||

Hi Wen Gu,

Previously this condition assumed that peer could be NULL,
and that is still the case in the next condition, a few lines down.
But with this patch peer is unconditionally dereferenced here.

As flagged by Smatch.

> +		     (lgr->peer_gid.gid == peer_gid->gid &&
> +		      !smc_ism_is_virtual(dev) ? 1 :
> +		      lgr->peer_gid.gid_ext == peer_gid->gid_ext)) &&
>  		    (vlan == VLAN_VID_MASK || lgr->vlan_id == vlan)) {
>  			if (peer_gid) /* peer triggered termination */
>  				lgr->peer_shutdown = 1;

...