lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:14:22 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Jerry Shih <jerry.shih@...ive.com>
Cc:     paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        davem@...emloft.net, andy.chiu@...ive.com, greentime.hu@...ive.com,
        conor.dooley@...rochip.com, guoren@...nel.org, bjorn@...osinc.com,
        heiko@...ech.de, ardb@...nel.org, phoebe.chen@...ive.com,
        hongrong.hsu@...ive.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] RISC-V: crypto: add accelerated
 AES-CBC/CTR/ECB/XTS implementations

On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:16:39PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > +	  Architecture: riscv64 using:
> > +	  - Zvbb vector extension (XTS)
> > +	  - Zvkb vector crypto extension (CTR/XTS)
> > +	  - Zvkg vector crypto extension (XTS)
> > +	  - Zvkned vector crypto extension
> 
> Maybe list Zvkned first since it's the most important one in this context.

BTW, I'd like to extend this request to the implementation names
(.cra_driver_name) and the names of the files as well.  I.e., instead of:

    aes-riscv64-zvkned
    aes-riscv64-zvkb-zvkned
    aes-riscv64-zvbb-zvkg-zvkned
    sha256-riscv64-zvkb-zvknha_or_zvknhb
    sha512-riscv64-zvkb-zvknhb

... we'd have:

    aes-riscv64-zvkned
    aes-riscv64-zvkned-zvkb
    aes-riscv64-zvkned-zvbb-zvkg
    sha256-riscv64-zvknha_or_zvknhb-zvkb
    sha512-riscv64-zvknhb-zvkb

and similarly for the cra_driver_name fields.

I think that's much more logical.  Do you agree?

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ