[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR03MB7141C58C008920173B3AE998F9B9A@PH0PR03MB7141.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 06:13:52 +0000
From: "Paller, Kim Seer" <KimSeer.Paller@...log.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add admfm2000
> > ---
> > V2 -> V3: Adjusted indentation to resolve wrong indentation warning.
> > Changed node name to converter. Updated the descriptions to clarify
> > the properties.
>
>
> > +title: ADMFM2000 Dual Microwave Down Converter
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Kim Seer Paller <kimseer.paller@...log.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + Dual microwave down converter module with input RF and LO frequency
> ranges
> > + from 0.5 to 32 GHz and an output IF frequency range from 0.1 to 8 GHz.
> > + It consists of a LNA, mixer, IF filter, DSA, and IF amplifier for each down
> > + conversion path.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - adi,admfm2000
> > +
> > + switch1-gpios:
> > + items:
> > + - description:
> > + Setting B15 GPIO to high and B16 GPIO to low will result in channel 1
> > + being in Direct IF mode.
> > + - description:
> > + Setting B15 GPIO to low and B16 GPIO to high will result in channel 1
> > + being in Mixer mode.
>
> This still does not tell which one is B15 and which is B16. I am asking
> this for third time.
>
> items:
> - description: B15 GPIO, when high (and B16 low) channel 1 is in
> Direct IF mode
I understand now, thank you. I was also wondering if this applies to the
attenuation-gpios, or if I should keep it as is?
Best regards,
Kim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists