linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] nvme link failure fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <a9ef56fa-725f-4d18-b408-ce0ba13c2d6e@app.fastmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:25:13 +0100
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     "Keith Busch" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>,
        "Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] nvme link failure fixes

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023, at 02:42, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/22/23 3:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> 
>> There are still a couple of link failures that I tried to address
>> with a previous patch. I've split up the missing bits into smaller
>> patches and tried to explain the bugs in more detail.
>> 
>> With these applied, randconfig builds work again. Please either
>> merge them or treat them as bug reports and find a different fix,
>> I won't do another version.
>
> Applied, but had to hand-apply hunk 9 of patch 3 due to a previous
> attempt at this:
>
> commit 23441536b63677cb2ed9b1637d8ca70315e44bd0
> Author: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
> Date:   Tue Nov 14 14:18:21 2023 +0100
>
>     nvme-tcp: only evaluate 'tls' option if TLS is selected

Ok, thanks for merging my changes! The commit from Hannes
is what I had in my v1 for this, and it was a correct fix
as well, my patch 3/3 was just a more elaborate way to do
the same thing that I did since Hannes did not like my
version at first.

The 23441536b6 commit was not in linux-next yesterday, so
it looks like our patches crossed paths on the same day.

     Arnd