[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB9PR05MB9078EEC976944CACEC531C1388B9A@DB9PR05MB9078.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 06:54:11 +0000
From: Tung Quang Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@...tech.com.au>
To: xu <xu.xin.sc@...il.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"jmaloy@...hat.com" <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"xu.xin16@....com.cn" <xu.xin16@....com.cn>,
"ying.xue@...driver.com" <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
"yang.yang29@....com.cn" <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] net/tipc: reduce tipc_node lock holding time in
tipc_rcv
>>This patch is wrong. le->link and link status must be protected by node lock. See what happens if tipc_node_timeout() is called, and
>the link goes down:
>>tipc_node_timeout()
>> tipc_node_link_down()
>> {
>> struct tipc_link *l = le->link;
>> ...
>> if (delete) {
>> kfree(l);
>> le->link = NULL;
>> }
>> ...
>> }
>
>Happy to see your reply. But Why? 'delete' is false from tipc_node_timeout(). Refer to:
>https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc2/source/net/tipc/node.c#L844
I should have explained it clearly:
1/ link status must be protected.
tipc_node_timeout()
tipc_node_link_down()
{
struct tipc_link *l = le->link;
...
__tipc_node_link_down(); <-- link status is referred.
...
if (delete) {
kfree(l);
le->link = NULL;
}
...
}
__tipc_node_link_down()
{
...
if (!l || tipc_link_is_reset(l)) <-- read link status
...
tipc_link_reset(l); <--- this function will reset all things related to link.
}
2/ le->link must be protected.
bearer_disable()
{
...
tipc_node_delete_links(net, bearer_id); <--- this will delete all links.
...
}
tipc_node_delete_links()
{
...
tipc_node_link_down(n, bearer_id, true);
...
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists