[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2d818fd-9dad-4beb-82a5-caf30f146bb5@starfivetech.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:53:36 +0800
From: Shengyang Chen <shengyang.chen@...rfivetech.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
<vkoul@...nel.org>, <kishon@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>,
<changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com>, <rogerq@...nel.org>,
<geert+renesas@...der.be>, <keith.zhao@...rfivetech.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add starfive,jh7110-dphy-tx
Dear Rob,
Thank you for your review and comment
On 2023/11/20 0:09, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:04:20PM +0800, Shengyang Chen wrote:
>> StarFive SoCs like the jh7110 use a MIPI D-PHY TX
>> controller based on a M31 IP. Add a binding for it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shengyang Chen <shengyang.chen@...rfivetech.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/phy/starfive,jh7110-dphy-tx.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/starfive,jh7110-dphy-tx.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/starfive,jh7110-dphy-tx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/starfive,jh7110-dphy-tx.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..850fe2e61d1d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/starfive,jh7110-dphy-tx.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/starfive,jh7110-dphy-tx.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Starfive SoC MIPI D-PHY Tx Controller
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Keith Zhao <keith.zhao@...rfivetech.com>
>> + - Shengyang Chen <shengyang.chen@...rfivetech.com>
>> +
>> +description:
>> + The Starfive SoC uses the MIPI DSI D-PHY based on M31 IP to transfer
>> + DSI data.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + const: starfive,jh7110-dphy-tx
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + clocks:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + clock-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: dphy_txesc
>
> Module name is redundant. Drop 'dphy_'.
>
OK, will drop "dphy_".
>> +
>> + resets:
>> + items:
>> + - description: DSITX_TXBYTEHS reset
>> + - description: MIPITX_DPHY_SYS reset
>> + - description: MIPITX_DPHY_TXBYTEHS reset
>> +
>> + reset-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: dsi_txbytehs
>> + - const: dphy_sys
>> + - const: dphy_txbytehs
>
> Drop 'dphy_'.
>
OK, will drop "dphy_".
> Is 'dsi_txbytehs' really a part of the DPHY block? Sounds like it is
> part of the DSI block. If so, the reset belongs there. If the phy driver
> needs it, then it needs to go find the DSI block and get its reset.
>
"dsi_txbytehs" is a reset of DSI block, it will be put back to DSI block and remove from DPHY block.
>> +
>> + power-domains:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + "#phy-cells":
>> + const: 0
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> + - clocks
>> + - clock-names
>> + - resets
>> + - reset-names
>> + - power-domains
>> + - "#phy-cells"
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + phy@...e0000 {
>> + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-dphy-tx";
>> + reg = <0x295e0000 0x10000>;
>> + clocks = <&voutcrg 14>;
>> + clock-names = "dphy_txesc";
>> + resets = <&syscrg 7>,
>> + <&syscrg 10>,
>> + <&syscrg 11>;
>> + reset-names = "dsi_txbytehs", "dphy_sys", "dphy_txbytehs";
>> + power-domains = <&aon_syscon 0>;
>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
thanks a lot.
Best Regards,
Shengyang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists