[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <170074082435.27332.7452962954462258378.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:00:24 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
Cc: sgoutham@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com, sbhatta@...vell.com,
hkelam@...vell.com, lcherian@...vell.com, jerinj@...vell.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, horms@...nel.org,
wojciech.drewek@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net PATCH v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct
packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>:
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:26:24 +0530 you wrote:
> It is possible to add a ntuple rule which would like to direct packet to
> a VF whose number of queues are greater/less than its PF's queue numbers.
> For example a PF can have 2 Rx queues but a VF created on that PF can have
> 8 Rx queues. As of today, ntuple rule will reject rule because it is
> checking the requested queue number against PF's number of Rx queues.
> As a part of this fix if the action of a ntuple rule is to move a packet
> to a VF's queue then the check is removed. Also, a debug information is
> printed to aware user that it is user's responsibility to cross check if
> the requested queue number on that VF is a valid one.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/4aa1d8f89b10
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists