linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2023 13:32:37 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding
 for stm32mp25 platform

On 23/11/2023 10:39, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:

> ok i will use '
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..9876ee0dd1e4
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,492 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */
>> Any particular reason why do you need 3-clause BSD? Checkpatch asks for
>> different one, because that one clause is just annoying.
> 
> Yes, the same file can also be used in other components, such as 
> TF-A/OPTEE, and can therefore have a dual licence.

That's not what I asked. I asked: why do you choose different dual
license then we ask for (as expressed in checkpatch).

Best regards,
Krzysztof