linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25e18413-e23f-444d-82fe-d36cba662638@foss.st.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:35:25 +0100
From:   Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC:     <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding
 for stm32mp25 platform


On 11/23/23 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/11/2023 10:39, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
>
>> ok i will use '
>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..9876ee0dd1e4
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,492 @@
>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */
>>> Any particular reason why do you need 3-clause BSD? Checkpatch asks for
>>> different one, because that one clause is just annoying.
>> Yes, the same file can also be used in other components, such as
>> TF-A/OPTEE, and can therefore have a dual licence.
> That's not what I asked. I asked: why do you choose different dual
> license then we ask for (as expressed in checkpatch).


Sorry for the delay, i checked with our licensing experts and we 
concluded that there was no particular reason to use BSD-3-clause 
instead of the BSD-2-clause model.


I'm sending back a new version under GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause 
license model.

Best Regards

Gabriel


> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>