linux-kernel - Re: scsi regression that after months is still not addressed and now bothering 6.1.y users, too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1cyvywzk5.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:44:24 -0500
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
        Sagar Biradar <sagar.biradar@...rochip.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions <aacraid@...rosemi.com>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gilbert Wu <gilbert.wu@...rochip.com>,
        John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: scsi regression that after months is still not addressed and
 now bothering 6.1.y users, too


Greg,

> I am loath to revert a stable patch that has been there for so long as
> any upgrade will just cause the same bug to show back up. Why can't we
> just revert it in Linus's tree now and I'll take that revert in the
> stable trees as well?

Hannes just posted another tentative patch. I'd prefer an incremental
fix if possible.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering