linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] tools/nolibc: add support for getrlimit/setrlimit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231126092828.GB7407@1wt.eu>
Date:   Sun, 26 Nov 2023 10:28:28 +0100
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tools/nolibc: add support for getrlimit/setrlimit

Hi Thomas,

> +int test_rlimit(void)
> +{
> +	struct rlimit rlim = {
> +		.rlim_cur = 1 << 20,
> +		.rlim_max = 1 << 20,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = setrlimit(RLIMIT_CORE, &rlim);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	rlim.rlim_cur = 0;
> +	rlim.rlim_max = 0;
> +
> +	ret = getrlimit(RLIMIT_CORE, &rlim);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (rlim.rlim_cur != 1 << 20)
> +		return -1;
> +	if (rlim.rlim_max != 1 << 20)
> +		return -1;

I think you should used two different values here for cur and max so
that you can also detect stupid API bugs such as a union being used
instead of a struct, or copy-pastes in the implementation etc. For
example using 1<<20 and 1<<21 should do the trick.

Otherwise Ack-by me for the whole series, of course.

Thanks,
Willy