[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c26613b-4aba-4e1e-bf0e-57feff23e303@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:14:29 +0530
From: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@...com>
To: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@...tec.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: <lars@...afoo.de>, <robh@...nel.org>, <heiko@...ech.de>,
<peter.ujfalusi@...com>, <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<nm@...com>, <upstream@...ts.phytec.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: Fix return value check of
tiadc_request_dma()
LGTM !!🙂
On 24/11/23 5:41 pm, Wadim Egorov wrote:
>
> Am 05.10.23 um 16:09 schrieb Jonathan Cameron:
>> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:44:27 +0200
>> Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@...tec.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Fix wrong handling of a DMA request where the probing only failed
>>> if -EPROPE_DEFER was returned. Instead, let us fail if a non -ENODEV
>>> value is returned. This makes DMAs explicitly optional. Even if the
>>> DMA request is unsuccessfully, the ADC can still work properly.
>>> We do also handle the defer probe case by making use of
>>> dev_err_probe().
>>>
>>> Fixes: f438b9da75eb ("drivers: iio: ti_am335x_adc: add dma support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@...tec.de>
Reviewed-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@...com>
>> +CC Bhavya,
>>
>> Could you take a look at this given you had comments on v1.
>
> Bhavya, any comments on this?
> If not, is there anything else that is blocking this patch?
>
> Regards,
> Wadim
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> Â Â - Update description
>>> Â Â - Drop line break after Fixes tag
>>> Â Â - Move decision about optional DMA into probe/caller
>>> ---
>>> Â drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c | 4 +++-
>>> Â 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>>> b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>>> index 8db7a01cb5fb..5f8795986995 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>>> @@ -670,8 +670,10 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>> Â Â Â Â Â platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â err = tiadc_request_dma(pdev, adc_dev);
>>> -Â Â Â if (err && err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> +Â Â Â if (err && err != -ENODEV) {
>>> +Â Â Â Â Â Â Â dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err, "DMA request failed\n");
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â goto err_dma;
>>> +Â Â Â }
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists