[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee913bc5-c752-4da7-a140-7492f429c2cb@notapiano>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:43:53 -0500
From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>
To: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"kernelci@...ts.linux.dev" <kernelci@...ts.linux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] kselftest: devices: Add sample board file for
google,spherion
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:10:46AM +0000, Bird, Tim wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
> > Add a sample board file describing the file's format and with the list
> > of devices expected to be probed on the google,spherion machine as an
> > example.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
> > ---
> >
> > (no changes since v1)
> >
> > .../testing/selftests/devices/boards/google,spherion | 12 ++++++++++++
>
> Overall, while trying to maintain a comprehensive set of board definitions
> seems hard, I think having a few as examples is useful.
>
> I'm not a big fan of naming these with a comma in the name. Is there a reason
> you are not using dash or underscore?
I'm using the name that we get from the DT compatible, so the right file can be
automatically selected by the test.
>
> Do you anticipate a convention of <producer> <board-or-product-name> tuples for
> the filename?
I'd just stick to the DT compatible as it's the simplest option and should work
just the same, assuming I understood correctly what you mean.
Thanks,
Nícolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists