[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9bbd6a7-3802-4236-9957-6147eb4fd644@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 08:14:07 +0000
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: michael@...le.cc, jaimeliao.tw@...il.com, jaimeliao@...c.com.tw,
pratyush@...nel.org, richard@....at, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: stop printing superfluous debug info
On 11/27/23 17:15, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Tudor,
>
Hi!
> tudor.ambarus@...aro.org wrote on Mon, 27 Nov 2023 16:59:08 +0000:
>
>> The mtd data can be obtain with the mtd ioctls and the SPI NOR
>> flash name can be determined interrogating the sysfs entries.
>> Stop polluting the kernel log.
>
> Actually I like these prints when developing/fixing stuff, it's a clear
> indication of what's been discovered that is available even if for some
> reason my rootfs is not available (which is common when the rootfs is
> on a spi-nor).
>
> So I would not trash all these lines personally... I believe the
What do you find useful about these prints? Maybe you mean that you'd
like some indicator that the SPI NOR probed successfully? How abut
adding a debug message at the end of mtd_device_register(), or otherwise
after mtd_device_register() is called?
> dev_info can be lowered if you prefer, but dev_dbg is already meant for
> debugging purposes and will anyway be discarded by default.
Yes, if we're going to keep these sort of prints I think we should
definitely lower them from info to dbg. It will speed the boot time and
stop polluting the kernel log.
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists