[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ac7f79a-68d3-49ef-9615-3c0076591d78@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:33:33 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jacky Huang <ychuang570808@...il.com>, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, j.neuschaefer@....net
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ychuang3@...oton.com, schung@...oton.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Document nuvoton ma35d1 pin
control
On 28/11/2023 09:29, Jacky Huang wrote:
> Dear Krzysztof,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
>
> On 2023/11/28 下午 03:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/11/2023 07:11, Jacky Huang wrote:
>>> From: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>
>>>
>>> Add documentation to describe nuvoton ma35d1 pin control and GPIO.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>
>>> ---
>> Your changelog said:
>>
>>> - Remove ma35d1-pinfunc.h which is unused after update definition of
>> 'nuvoton,pins'.
>>
>> You forgot to add:
>>
>> " - Do not test the bindings before sending"
>>
>> I assume none of the driver changes compile either.
>
> It's my mistake. I forgot to remove 'ma35d1-pinfunc.h' from my local
> copy, and as a consequence, the 'dt_binding_check' did not catch this
> error. I will fix this.
But then git status would point you that tree is not clean and you did
not finish commiting.
..
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> + - $ref: pinctrl.yaml#
>> allOf goes before additionalProperties.
>>
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - nuvoton,sys
>> This goes after patternProperties
>
> I will fix the above two as:
>
> allOf:
> - $ref: pinctrl.yaml#
Look:
>> allOf goes before additionalProperties.
Open example-schema.
..
>
>>> + - $ref: pincfg-node.yaml#
>>> +
>>> + properties:
>>> + bias-disable: true
>> Drop this and other "true", why do you need them here?
>
> We are following the conventions used in other pinctrl documents, such as
> 'realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml' and 'xlnx,zynqmp-pinctrl.yaml'.
But they are quite different there.
>
> After comparing various pinctrl documents, I noticed that they all express
> it as 'bias-disable: true'. Therefore, may I keep the current format?
No, you cannot copy pieces of other binding, selectively ignoring the
rest. Look how these other bindings are constructed - they have
additionalProperties, which you don't.
Drop all these true properties if the only reason of them being here is
they were copied.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists