[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023112826-cesspool-cabbie-06c5@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:54:01 +0000
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
initramfs@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rootfs: Fix support for rootfstype= when root= is
given
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 08:12:48PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.rst states:
>
> If CONFIG_TMPFS is enabled, rootfs will use tmpfs instead of ramfs by
> default. To force ramfs, add "rootfstype=ramfs" to the kernel command
> line.
>
> This currently does not work when root= is provided since then
> saved_root_name contains a string and rootfstype= is ignored. Therefore,
> ramfs is currently always chosen when root= is provided.
>
> The current behavior for rootfs's filesystem is:
>
> root= | rootfstype= | chosen rootfs filesystem
> ------------+-------------+--------------------------
> unspecified | unspecified | tmpfs
> unspecified | tmpfs | tmpfs
> unspecified | ramfs | ramfs
> provided | ignored | ramfs
>
> rootfstype= should be respected regardless whether root= is given,
> as shown below:
>
> root= | rootfstype= | chosen rootfs filesystem
> ------------+-------------+--------------------------
> unspecified | unspecified | tmpfs (as before)
> unspecified | tmpfs | tmpfs (as before)
> unspecified | ramfs | ramfs (as before)
> provided | unspecified | ramfs (compatibility with before)
> provided | tmpfs | tmpfs (new)
> provided | ramfs | ramfs (new)
>
> This table represents the new behavior.
>
> Fixes: 6e19eded3684 ("initmpfs: use initramfs if rootfstype= or root= specified")
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8244c75f-445e-b15b-9dbf-266e7ca666e2@landley.net/
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Who should take this patch? Me? Or someone else?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists