[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10660ec7032cf66a772ecd0b7cfdbba88849929a.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 07:18:07 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, initramfs@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rootfs: Fix support for rootfstype= when root= is
given
On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 09:54 +0000, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 08:12:48PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.rst states:
> >
> > If CONFIG_TMPFS is enabled, rootfs will use tmpfs instead of ramfs by
> > default. To force ramfs, add "rootfstype=ramfs" to the kernel command
> > line.
> >
> > This currently does not work when root= is provided since then
> > saved_root_name contains a string and rootfstype= is ignored. Therefore,
> > ramfs is currently always chosen when root= is provided.
> >
> > The current behavior for rootfs's filesystem is:
> >
> > root= | rootfstype= | chosen rootfs filesystem
> > ------------+-------------+--------------------------
> > unspecified | unspecified | tmpfs
> > unspecified | tmpfs | tmpfs
> > unspecified | ramfs | ramfs
> > provided | ignored | ramfs
> >
> > rootfstype= should be respected regardless whether root= is given,
> > as shown below:
> >
> > root= | rootfstype= | chosen rootfs filesystem
> > ------------+-------------+--------------------------
> > unspecified | unspecified | tmpfs (as before)
> > unspecified | tmpfs | tmpfs (as before)
> > unspecified | ramfs | ramfs (as before)
> > provided | unspecified | ramfs (compatibility with before)
> > provided | tmpfs | tmpfs (new)
> > provided | ramfs | ramfs (new)
> >
> > This table represents the new behavior.
> >
> > Fixes: 6e19eded3684 ("initmpfs: use initramfs if rootfstype= or root= specified")
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8244c75f-445e-b15b-9dbf-266e7ca666e2@landley.net/
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> Who should take this patch? Me? Or someone else?
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks, Greg. As there is no initramfs maintainer, I'd appreciate your
picking it up.
--
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists