[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfc3aa17-0f1b-4ffc-b848-33baa51b1196@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:48:02 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: No care given to GDB scripts..
Hello,
It is quite clear that there are zero cares being given to making sure
that GDB scripts continue to work after making changes to core kernel
code, and why would you, because you probably did not know those
existed, but they do and they are used, and useful.
A recent example that was fixed by Kuan-Ying is this:
and now of course, "lx-interupts" also stopped working altogether after
this change:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230519134902.1495562-4-sdonthineni@nvidia.com
and who knows what else I could not test that is also broken.
We really need to find a better way to stop breaking GDB scripts, they
break way too often to be even remotely usable, and this is really sad.
It is also quite clear that we do not have enough continuous integration
and regression testing to ensure those breakages are caught ahead of time...
</rant>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists