| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a3ece21f-71fd-ebb8-3d89-b3f0cdb6b9e0@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:23:44 +0800
From: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eauger@...hat.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Make the
[create|destroy]_vpmu_vm() can be reused
Hi Eric,
On 11/25/23 02:14, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Shaoqin,
>
> On 11/23/23 07:37, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
>> Move the [create|destroy]_vpmu_vm() into the lib/, which makes those
> some wording suggestions below:
>
> Move the implementation of .. into lib/aarch64/pmu.c and export their
> declaration in a header so that they can be reused by other tests. Also
> the title may be renamed: Make [create|destroy]_vpmu_vm() public
>> function can be used by other tests. Install the handler is specific to
> the sync exception handler install is test specific so we move it out of
> the helper function.
>> the vpmu_counter_access test, so create a wrapper function for it, and
>> only move the common part.
>>
>> No functional change.
> intended ;-)
Will take your advice at the next version.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
>> .../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 100 +++++-------------
>> .../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h | 16 +++
>> .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c | 64 +++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
>> index a5963ab9215b..b60852c222ac 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/processor.c
>> LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/spinlock.c
>> LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/ucall.c
>> LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/vgic.c
>> +LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/vpmu.c
>>
>> LIBKVM_s390x += lib/s390x/diag318_test_handler.c
>> LIBKVM_s390x += lib/s390x/processor.c
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
>> index 5ea78986e665..17305408a334 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <processor.h>
>> #include <test_util.h>
>> #include <vgic.h>
>> +#include <vpmu.h>
>> #include <perf/arm_pmuv3.h>
>> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>>
>> @@ -25,13 +26,7 @@
>> /* The cycle counter bit position that's common among the PMU registers */
>> #define ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX 31
>>
>> -struct vpmu_vm {
>> - struct kvm_vm *vm;
>> - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> - int gic_fd;
>> -};
>> -
>> -static struct vpmu_vm vpmu_vm;
>> +static struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm;
>>
>> struct pmreg_sets {
>> uint64_t set_reg_id;
>> @@ -421,64 +416,6 @@ static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
>> GUEST_DONE();
>> }
>>
>> -#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL
>> -#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL
>> -
>> -/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */
>> -static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
>> -{
>> - struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
>> - uint8_t pmuver, ec;
>> - uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23;
>> - struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = {
>> - .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
>> - .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ,
>> - .addr = (uint64_t)&irq,
>> - };
>> - struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = {
>> - .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
>> - .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT,
>> - };
>> -
>> - /* The test creates the vpmu_vm multiple times. Ensure a clean state */
>> - memset(&vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm));
>> -
>> - vpmu_vm.vm = vm_create(1);
>> - vm_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vm);
>> - for (ec = 0; ec < ESR_EC_NUM; ec++) {
>> - vm_install_sync_handler(vpmu_vm.vm, VECTOR_SYNC_CURRENT, ec,
>> - guest_sync_handler);
>> - }
>> -
>> - /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
>> - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
>> - init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
>> - vpmu_vm.vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
>> - vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vcpu);
>> - vpmu_vm.gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vpmu_vm.vm, 1, 64,
>> - GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA);
>> - __TEST_REQUIRE(vpmu_vm.gic_fd >= 0,
>> - "Failed to create vgic-v3, skipping");
>> -
>> - /* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */
>> - vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm.vcpu,
>> - KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), &dfr0);
>> - pmuver = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), dfr0);
>> - TEST_ASSERT(pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF &&
>> - pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP,
>> - "Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver);
>> -
>> - /* Initialize vPMU */
>> - vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr);
>> - vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void destroy_vpmu_vm(void)
>> -{
>> - close(vpmu_vm.gic_fd);
>> - kvm_vm_free(vpmu_vm.vm);
>> -}
>> -
>> static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n)
>> {
>> struct ucall uc;
>> @@ -497,13 +434,24 @@ static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void create_vpmu_vm_with_handler(void *guest_code)
>> +{
>> + uint8_t ec;
>> + vpmu_vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code);
>> +
>> + for (ec = 0; ec < ESR_EC_NUM; ec++) {
>> + vm_install_sync_handler(vpmu_vm->vm, VECTOR_SYNC_CURRENT, ec,
>> + guest_sync_handler);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static void test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(uint64_t pmcr_n, bool expect_fail)
>> {
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_orig;
>>
>> - create_vpmu_vm(guest_code);
>> - vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
>> + create_vpmu_vm_with_handler(guest_code);
>> + vcpu = vpmu_vm->vcpu;
>>
>> vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr_orig);
>> pmcr = pmcr_orig;
>> @@ -539,7 +487,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
>> pr_debug("Test with pmcr_n %lu\n", pmcr_n);
>>
>> test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(pmcr_n, false);
>> - vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
>> + vcpu = vpmu_vm->vcpu;
>>
>> /* Save the initial sp to restore them later to run the guest again */
>> vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), &sp);
>> @@ -550,7 +498,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
>> * Reset and re-initialize the vCPU, and run the guest code again to
>> * check if PMCR_EL0.N is preserved.
>> */
>> - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
>> + vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm->vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
>> init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
>> aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
>> vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu);
>> @@ -559,7 +507,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
>>
>> run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n);
>>
>> - destroy_vpmu_vm();
>> + destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm);
>> }
>>
>> static struct pmreg_sets validity_check_reg_sets[] = {
>> @@ -580,7 +528,7 @@ static void run_pmregs_validity_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
>> uint64_t valid_counters_mask, max_counters_mask;
>>
>> test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(pmcr_n, false);
>> - vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
>> + vcpu = vpmu_vm->vcpu;
>>
>> valid_counters_mask = get_counters_mask(pmcr_n);
>> max_counters_mask = get_counters_mask(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS);
>> @@ -621,7 +569,7 @@ static void run_pmregs_validity_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
>> KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(clr_reg_id), reg_val);
>> }
>>
>> - destroy_vpmu_vm();
>> + destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -634,7 +582,7 @@ static void run_error_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
>> pr_debug("Error test with pmcr_n %lu (larger than the host)\n", pmcr_n);
>>
>> test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(pmcr_n, true);
>> - destroy_vpmu_vm();
>> + destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -645,9 +593,9 @@ static uint64_t get_pmcr_n_limit(void)
>> {
>> uint64_t pmcr;
>>
>> - create_vpmu_vm(guest_code);
>> - vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr);
>> - destroy_vpmu_vm();
>> + create_vpmu_vm_with_handler(guest_code);
>> + vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm->vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr);
>> + destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm);
>> return get_pmcr_n(pmcr);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..0a56183644ee
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +
>> +#include <kvm_util.h>
>> +
>> +#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL
>> +#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL
>> +
>> +struct vpmu_vm {
>> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> + int gic_fd;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct vpmu_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code);
>> +
>> +void destroy_vpmu_vm(struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm);
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b3de8fdc555e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +
>> +#include <kvm_util.h>
>> +#include <processor.h>
>> +#include <test_util.h>
>> +#include <vgic.h>
>> +#include <vpmu.h>
>> +#include <perf/arm_pmuv3.h>
>> +
>> +/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */
>> +struct vpmu_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
>> + uint8_t pmuver;
>> + uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23;
>> + struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = {
>> + .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
>> + .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ,
>> + .addr = (uint64_t)&irq,
>> + };
>> + struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = {
>> + .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
>> + .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT,
>> + };
>> + struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm;
>> +
>> + vpmu_vm = calloc(1, sizeof(*vpmu_vm));
>> + TEST_ASSERT(vpmu_vm != NULL, "Insufficient Memory");
>> + memset(vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm));
>> +
>> + vpmu_vm->vm = vm_create(1);
>> + vm_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm->vm);
>> +
>> + /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
>> + vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm->vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
>> + init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
>> + vpmu_vm->vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vpmu_vm->vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
>> + vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm->vcpu);
>> + vpmu_vm->gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vpmu_vm->vm, 1, 64,
>> + GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA);
>> + __TEST_REQUIRE(vpmu_vm->gic_fd >= 0,
>> + "Failed to create vgic-v3, skipping");
>> +
>> + /* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */
>> + vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm->vcpu,
>> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), &dfr0);
>> + pmuver = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), dfr0);
>> + TEST_ASSERT(pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF &&
>> + pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP,
>> + "Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver);
>> +
>> + /* Initialize vPMU */
>> + vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr);
>> + vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr);
>> +
>> + return vpmu_vm;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void destroy_vpmu_vm(struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm)
>> +{
>> + close(vpmu_vm->gic_fd);
>> + kvm_vm_free(vpmu_vm->vm);
>> + free(vpmu_vm);
>> +}
> Besides looks good to me
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Thanks for your review. :)
>
> Eric
>
>
--
Shaoqin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists