linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231130164612.GU3043@thinkpad>
Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:16:12 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, imx@...ts.linux.dev, kw@...ux.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        lpieralisi@...nel.org, minghuan.Lian@....com, mingkai.hu@....com,
        robh@...nel.org, roy.zang@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_*

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 04:44:11PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> 'pf' and 'lut' is just difference name in difference chips, but basic it is
> a MMIO base address plus an offset.
> 
> Rename it to avoid duplicate pf_* and lut_* in driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>

Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>

Can you fix the name in pci-layerscape-ep.c also?

- Mani

> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     pf_lut is better than pf_* or lut* because some chip use 'pf', some chip
>     use 'lut'.
>     
>     change from v1 to v4
>     - new patch at v3
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 34 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index 42bca2c3b5c3e..590e07bb27002 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
>  #define PCIE_IATU_NUM		6
>  
>  struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> -	const u32 pf_off;
> +	const u32 pf_lut_off;
>  	const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
>  	int (*exit_from_l2)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
>  	bool scfg_support;
> @@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
>  struct ls_pcie {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
>  	const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> -	void __iomem *pf_base;
> +	void __iomem *pf_lut_base;
>  	struct regmap *scfg;
>  	int index;
>  	bool big_endian;
>  };
>  
> -#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
> +#define ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, addr)
>  #define to_ls_pcie(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>  
>  static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -101,20 +101,20 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>  	iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
>  }
>  
> -static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +static u32 ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
>  {
>  	if (pcie->big_endian)
> -		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  
> -	return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +	return ioread32(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  }
>  
> -static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +static void ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
>  {
>  	if (pcie->big_endian)
> -		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  	else
> -		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  }
>  
>  static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> @@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  	u32 val;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
>  	val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
> -	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>  
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
>  				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR),
>  				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
>  				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US);
> @@ -147,15 +147,15 @@ static int ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  	 * Set PF_MCR_EXL2S bit in LS_PCIE_PF_MCR register for the link
>  	 * to exit L2 state.
>  	 */
> -	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
>  	val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
> -	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * L2 exit timeout of 10ms is not defined in the specifications,
>  	 * it was chosen based on empirical observations.
>  	 */
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
>  				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S),
>  				 1000,
>  				 10000);
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
> -	.pf_off = 0xc0000,
> +	.pf_lut_off = 0xc0000,
>  	.pm_support = true,
>  	.exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
>  };
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
>  
> -	pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> +	pcie->pf_lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_lut_off;
>  
>  	if (pcie->drvdata->scfg_support) {
>  		pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "fsl,pcie-scfg");
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்