[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB60839D04A329087D11933B6CFC82A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:03:32 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Avadhut Naik <avadnaik@....com>
CC: "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yazen.ghannam@....com" <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@....com>
Subject: RE: [RESEND v2] ACPI: APEI: Skip initialization of GHES_ASSIST
structures for Machine Check Architecture
> Actually, caching of values from an earlier structure to be compared against values
> in a later structure is what we intend to do here i.e. comparing cached source_id
> from an earlier structure with related_source_id in a later structure. To hint
> towards the same, I had added the below comment on top of the static structure's
> declaration:
>
> >>> + * Since GHES_ASSIST is not supported, skip initialization
> >>> + * of GHES_ASSIST structures for MCA.
> >>> + * During HEST parsing, detected MCA error sources are cached.
> >>> + * Flags and Source Id fields from these cached values are
> >>> + * then referred to determine if the encountered GHES_ASSIST
> >>> + * structure should be initialized.
> >>> + */
>
> Is this not good enough? Should I make it more explicit?
I understand now, but missed that the caching and use are across
different entries in the HEST table.
Maybe something like this:
* Since GHES_ASSIST is not supported, skip initialization of GHES_ASSIST
* structures for MCA. During HEST parsing, detected MCA error sources
* are cached from early table entries so that Flags and Source Id
* fields from these cached values are then referred to in later table
* entries to determine if the encountered GHES_ASSIST structure should
* be initialized.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists