linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb: Fix lx-device-list-bus and lx-device-list-class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:51:33 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb: Fix lx-device-list-bus and
 lx-device-list-class

On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 20:33:16 -0800 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com> wrote:

> After the conversion to bus_to_subsys() and class_to_subsys(), the gdb
> scripts listing the system buses and classes respectively was broken,
> fix those by returning the subsys_priv pointer and have the various
> caller de-reference either the 'bus' or 'class' structure members
> accordingly.
> 
> Fixes: 83b9148df2c9 ("driver core: bus: bus iterator cleanups")
> Fixes: 7b884b7f24b4 ("driver core: class.c: convert to only use class_to_subsys")

I don't know how -stable maintainers handle more than one Fixes:.  One
of the above was released in 6.3, the other in 6.4.  What are they to
do?

My opinion: developers should use Fixes: as a request to -stable
maintainers to target a particular kernel version (and later).

If the developers indeed want to fix both kernel versions then wouldn't
two patches be best?