[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <170138160625.3648908.9493256732138039199.b4-ty@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:00:09 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VMCI: Annotate struct vmci_handle_arr with __counted_by
On Sat, 07 Oct 2023 16:32:34 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
>
>
> [...]
Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!
[1/1] VMCI: Annotate struct vmci_handle_arr with __counted_by
https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/81c643edd8bd
Take care,
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists