linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Minor grammatical fixup for livepatch docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:04:38 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Livepatching <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Minor grammatical fixup for livepatch docs

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 05:10:25PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > On 11/29/23 20:53, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> >> On 11/29/23 08:25, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> >>> I was prompted to write this little grammar fix series when reading
> >>> the fix from Attreyee [1], with review comments requesting changes
> >>> to that fix. So here's my version of the fix, with reviews from [1]
> >>> addressed (and distinct grammar fixes splitted).
> >>>
> >> 
> >> Typical kernel workflow would be for Attreyee to incorporate feedback
> >> and post their v2 after a day or two.  From the format they posted, it
> >> appears to be a first(ish) kernel contribution post.  Let's be kind and
> >> patient so they we all may benefit from the practice of iterating on
> >> their patch.
> >> 
> >
> > I do this posting because I thought the OP (Attreyee) didn't respond in
> > timely manner (just like random Chinese contributors like @cdjrlc.com
> > and @208suo.com people).
> 
> Seriously?  The original post was on Monday, yours came less than 48
> hours later.  Not only can we not expect that kind of rapid turnaround
> from anybody, but we actively discourage rapid resending of patches.
> Rather than dig yourself in deeper, I suggest you simply apologize to
> the original poster and find something more useful to do.

Done, thanks!

And yes, I'm also focusing on regression tracking and Bugzilla
triaging.

Ciao, Bagas.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)