[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZWoInq9QIuZXpTbc@pluto>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:23:58 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com, quic_asartor@...cinc.com,
quic_lingutla@...cinc.com, Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix possible frequency
truncation when using level indexing mode
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:43:43PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> The multiplier is already promoted to u64, however the frequency
> calculations done when using level indexing mode doesn't use the
> multiplier computed. It instead hardcodes the multiplier value of 1000
> at all the usage sites.
>
> Clean that up by assigning the multiplier value of 1000 when using
> the perf level indexing mode and upadte the frequency calculations to
^update
> use the multiplier instead. It should fix the possible frequency
> truncation for all the values greater than or equal to 4GHz.
>
> Fixes: 31c7c1397a33 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add v3.2 perf level indexing mode support")
> Reported-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231129065748.19871-3-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/
> Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> ---
Other than the typo, LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Thanks,
Cristian
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> index 8ce449922e55..875dcb71bb65 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> @@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ scmi_perf_domain_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> dom_info->sustained_perf_level =
> le32_to_cpu(attr->sustained_perf_level);
> if (!dom_info->sustained_freq_khz ||
> - !dom_info->sustained_perf_level)
> + !dom_info->sustained_perf_level ||
> + dom_info->level_indexing_mode)
> /* CPUFreq converts to kHz, hence default 1000 */
> dom_info->mult_factor = 1000;
> else
> @@ -806,7 +807,7 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_device_opps_add(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> if (!dom->level_indexing_mode)
> freq = dom->opp[idx].perf * dom->mult_factor;
> else
> - freq = dom->opp[idx].indicative_freq * 1000;
> + freq = dom->opp[idx].indicative_freq * dom->mult_factor;
>
> data.level = dom->opp[idx].perf;
> data.freq = freq;
> @@ -853,7 +854,8 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_freq_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 domain,
> } else {
> struct scmi_opp *opp;
>
> - opp = LOOKUP_BY_FREQ(dom->opps_by_freq, freq / 1000);
> + opp = LOOKUP_BY_FREQ(dom->opps_by_freq,
> + freq / dom->mult_factor);
> if (!opp)
> return -EIO;
>
> @@ -887,7 +889,7 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_freq_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 domain,
> if (!opp)
> return -EIO;
>
> - *freq = opp->indicative_freq * 1000;
> + *freq = opp->indicative_freq * dom->mult_factor;
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -910,7 +912,7 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_est_power_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> if (!dom->level_indexing_mode)
> opp_freq = opp->perf * dom->mult_factor;
> else
> - opp_freq = opp->indicative_freq * 1000;
> + opp_freq = opp->indicative_freq * dom->mult_factor;
>
> if (opp_freq < *freq)
> continue;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists