lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO3-Pbq04ZphnB42bSoVDc8sgQ+GbRaqPtXOscsSMC5tXm8UdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2023 12:19:23 -0600
From:   Yan Zhai <yan@...udflare.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...udflare.com,
        Jesper Brouer <jesper@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] packet: add a generic drop reason for receive

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:51 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> >         bool is_drop_n_account = false;
>
> Why keeping is_drop_n_account  then ?

Good catch, thanks! Will send a v3 to fix up.
Meanwhile, I noticed it is compiled with the
-Wno-unused-but-set-variable flag, is there a reason why we disable
this warning?

Yan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ