[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZWmCm8zzqJkaop1Z@google.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 06:52:11 +0000
From: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/21] binder: fix trivial typo of
binder_free_buf_locked()
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:08:05AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> It's a bit confusing that the pair of methods binder_alloc_free_buf and
> binder_free_buf_locked are inconsistent in whether they user the alloc_
> prefix. It might be worth it to change them to be consistent?
Right, the prefix is concistent across the APIs but not really for the
local function names. I wouldn't mind adding the "alloc" part, it just
seemed easier to fix the comment and backport that.
--
Carlos Llamas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists