linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: fix inconsistent example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ad96b95a-5f4f-4333-b767-762936932061@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:32:46 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: fix inconsistent example

On 30/11/2023 18:32, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The PM8921 is an SSBI PMIC but in the binding example it is described
> as being part of an SPMI PMIC while using an SSBI address.
> 
> Make the example consistent by using the sibling PM8941 SPMI PMIC
> instead.
> 
> Fixes: 8138c5f0318c ("dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx-rtc: Add qcom pm8xxx rtc bindings")

Similarly to your thermal patch - this is just an example, not a
binding. No bugs are fixed here, no need for backports.

> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml         | 36 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>


Best regards,
Krzysztof