[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231204113720.3c6ccf7b8eb11eda942d1215@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:37:20 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed an open function not judging the return value and
closed the open function
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 03:05:54 -0500 liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c
> index cacbd2a4aec9..5fc9b46f236f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-pid-vm.c
> @@ -205,7 +205,12 @@ static int make_exe(const uint8_t *payload, size_t len)
> /* Avoid ETXTBSY on exec. */
> snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/proc/self/fd/%u", fd);
> fd1 = open(buf, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC);
> + if (fd == -1) {
fd1
> + exit(1);
> + }
unneeded braces
> close(fd);
> + close(fd1);
>
> return fd1;
Returning an fd which we just closed is clearly wrong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists