[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b65f67a-8142-4690-af6e-4a0bf641b7be@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 08:56:58 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
agross@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] pinctrl: qcom: Add SM4450 pinctrl driver
On 04/12/2023 02:57, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>
>
> 在 11/30/2023 7:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>> On 30/11/2023 03:40, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>> Add pinctrl driver for TLMM block found in SM4450 SoC.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig.msm | 8 +
>>> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm4450.c | 1013 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 1022 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm4450.c
>>>
>>
>> Hm, was this patch ever built?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> This patch has been built before, I will check and compare if there are
> any errors and changes when I submitted this patch series.
>
No, it wasn't built. I just tried - applied it and:
pinctrl-sm4450.c:996:19: error: initialization of ‘int (*)(struct
platform_device *)’ from incompatible pointer type ‘void (*)(struct
platform_device *)’ [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
996 | .remove = msm_pinctrl_remove,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm4450.c:996:19: note: (near
initialization for ‘sm4450_tlmm_driver.remove’)
So you just sent a patch which was not even compiled.
NAK.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists