[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR18MB260210685BDED4A713503D9ECD86A@DM6PR18MB2602.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 05:22:53 +0000
From: Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [net v3 PATCH 3/5] octeontx2-af: Fix mcs stats register
address
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 10:31 PM
> To: Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kuba@...nel.org;
> davem@...emloft.net; pabeni@...hat.com; edumazet@...gle.com; Sunil
> Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>; Linu Cherian
> <lcherian@...vell.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@...vell.com>;
> Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>; Hariprasad Kelam
> <hkelam@...vell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [net v3 PATCH 3/5] octeontx2-af: Fix mcs stats register
> address
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:28:16PM +0530, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> > This patch adds the miss mcs stats register for mcs supported
> > platforms.
> >
> > Fixes: 9312150af8da ("octeontx2-af: cn10k: mcs: Support for stats
> > collection")
> > Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
> > ---
> > .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c | 4 +--
> > .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> > index d6effbe46208..d4a4e4c837ec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ void mcs_get_rx_secy_stats(struct mcs *mcs, struct
> mcs_secy_stats *stats, int id
> > reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYTAGGEDCTLX(id);
> > stats->pkt_tagged_ctl_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
> >
> > - reg =
> MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDORNOTAGX(id);
> > + reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(id);
> > stats->pkt_untaged_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
> >
> > reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(id);
> > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void mcs_get_sc_stats(struct mcs *mcs, struct
> mcs_sc_stats *stats,
> > reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCNOTVALIDX(id);
> > stats->pkt_notvalid_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
> >
> > - reg =
> MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDOROKX(id);
> > + reg =
> MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDX(id);
> > stats->pkt_unchecked_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
> >
> > if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> > index f3ab01fc363c..f4c6de89002c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> > @@ -810,14 +810,37 @@
> > offset = 0x9d8ull; \
> > offset; })
> >
> > +#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDX(a) ({ \
> > + u64 offset; \
> > + \
> > + offset = 0xee80ull; \
> > + if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
> > + offset = 0xe818ull; \
> > + offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
> > + offset; })
>
> Hi Geetha,
>
> I see this is consistent with existing code in this file, but I do wonder if there
> would be value in moving to a more compact mechanism at some point. F.e.
> (completely untested!):
>
> #define MCSX_REG(base, a) ((base) + (a) * 0x8ull) #define
> MCSX_MB_REG(base_mb, base, a) \
> MCSX_REG((mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1 ? (base_mb) : (base)), (a)) ...
> #define MCSX_MCS_TOP_SLAVE_PORT_RESET(a) MCSX_MB_REG(0xa28ull,
> 0x408ull, (a)) ...
> #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(a)
> MCSX_REG(0xb680ull, (a)) ...
>
Hi Simon,
Thanks for your suggestion. Will take this in different patch set.
> In any case, such a change isn't for this patch, which looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
>
> > +
> > +#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(a) ({ \
> > + u64 offset; \
> > + \
> > + offset = 0xa680ull; \
> > + if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
> > + offset = 0xd018ull; \
> > + offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
> > + offset; })
> > +
> > +#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCLATEORDELAYEDX(a) ({
> \
> > + u64 offset; \
> > + \
> > + offset = 0xf680ull; \
> > + if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
> > + offset = 0xe018ull; \
> > + offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
> > + offset; })
> > +
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INOCTETSSCDECRYPTEDX(a)
> (0xe680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INOCTETSSCVALIDATEX(a)
> (0xde80ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > -#define
> MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDORNOTAGX(a)
> (0xa680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYNOTAGX(a) (0xd218 + (a)
> * 0x8ull)
> > -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(a)
> (0xd018ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDOROKX(a)
> (0xee80ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(a)
> (0xb680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCLATEORDELAYEDX(a)
> (0xf680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSAINVALIDX(a) (0x12680ull +
> (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSANOTUSINGSAERRORX(a)
> (0x15680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSANOTVALIDX(a)
> (0x13680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists