lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <170178191007.32878.14836362585756098271.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 05 Dec 2023 13:11:50 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org
Cc:     perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johan+linaro@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: qcom: Limit Digital gains on speaker

On Mon, 04 Dec 2023 12:47:34 +0000, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
> Limit the speaker digital gains to 0dB so that the users will not damage them.
> Currently there is a limit in UCM, but this does not stop the user form
> changing the digital gains from command line. So limit this in driver
> which makes the speakers more safer without active speaker protection in
> place.
> 
> Apart from this there is also a range check fix in snd_soc_limit_volume
> to allow setting this limit correctly.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: ops: add correct range check for limiting volume
      commit: fb9ad24485087e0f00d84bee7a5914640b2b9024
[2/2] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: Limit speaker digital volumes
      commit: 716d4e5373e9d1ae993485ab2e3b893bf7104fb1

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ