[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVEvGb1u_0M3cBjk69c_Lrp6QAR77YEwuHKV295G4Ueyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:16:24 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] regulator: bd9571mwv: Convert to platform remove
callback returning void
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:26 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
> many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
> returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
> from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
>
> To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
> void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
> .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
> are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
>
> Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
> callback to the void returning variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists