[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZW9Hx2kCudM1Dc7z@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 12:54:47 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@...gle.com>,
Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@...il.com>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>,
Ming Wang <wangming01@...ngson.cn>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Li Dong <lidong@...o.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
liuwenyu <liuwenyu7@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Guilherme Amadio <amadio@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/50] perf record: Be lazier in allocating lost
samples buffer
Em Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 03:56:48PM -0800, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:29 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 6:09 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > To minimize the allocation size, this can be
> > > sizeof(*lost) + session->machines.host.id_hdr_size
> > > instead of PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE.
> >
> > Sounds good, should probably be a follow up. The current size is
> > PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE.
>
> Yep, I'm ok with having it as a follow-up.
>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists