linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] wifi: mwifiex: added code to support host mlme.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZW9+Iz9a3tEv3CpM@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2023 20:46:43 +0100
From:   Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To:     David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
Cc:     Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "briannorris@...omium.org" <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] wifi: mwifiex: added code to support
 host mlme.

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:05:47PM +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:31:03PM +0800, David Lin wrote:
> > > 5. Address reviewer comments.
> > You should list the changes you did, something that generic is forcing the
> > reviewer to compare v7 vs v6 to known what changed.
> 
> Can I summary what should I do and hopefully I can make agreement with you:
> 
> 1. Separate patch v7 6/12 as a single patch.
> 2. Merged all other patches as a single patch for host mlme.

I would suggest to proceed the following way:

 1. v8 of this series should have only 2 patches
   - PATCH v8 1/2 : add host mle station support.
   - PATCH v8 2/2 : add host mle AP support.

   Any kind of fix on these 2 new functionalities should be squashed in
   these single 2 patches. No commit to add a functionality with a bug
   that is fixed with a follow-up commit. If you discover bugs during
   your testing this is great, just amend the original commit that
   introduced it.

   I am assuming that is fair to implement station and AP support in
   separated patches, please speak up if this is not the case.

 2.  PATCH v7 06/12: this should be send as a new separate patch, with a
     Fixes: tag and Cc:stable. 

> So there should be no patch v8 and only have two patches, one for host
> mlme and another one to fix hostap restart issue.

It's ok to have a v8, restarting another series will be even more
confusing IMO.


Thanks!

Francesco