linux-kernel - RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] wifi: mwifiex: added code to support host mlme.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <PA4PR04MB9638E7962C38BC839F1E2826D184A@PA4PR04MB9638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2023 01:49:35 +0000
From:   David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
To:     Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
CC:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "briannorris@...omium.org" <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] wifi: mwifiex: added code to support
 host mlme.

> From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 3:47 AM
> To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
> Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>; linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; briannorris@...omium.org; kvalo@...nel.org;
> Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] wifi: mwifiex: added code to support
> host mlme.
> 
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
> this email' button
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:05:47PM +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:31:03PM +0800, David Lin wrote:
> > > > 5. Address reviewer comments.
> > > You should list the changes you did, something that generic is
> > > forcing the reviewer to compare v7 vs v6 to known what changed.
> >
> > Can I summary what should I do and hopefully I can make agreement with
> you:
> >
> > 1. Separate patch v7 6/12 as a single patch.
> > 2. Merged all other patches as a single patch for host mlme.
> 
> I would suggest to proceed the following way:
> 
>  1. v8 of this series should have only 2 patches
>    - PATCH v8 1/2 : add host mle station support.
>    - PATCH v8 2/2 : add host mle AP support.
> 
>    Any kind of fix on these 2 new functionalities should be squashed in
>    these single 2 patches. No commit to add a functionality with a bug
>    that is fixed with a follow-up commit. If you discover bugs during
>    your testing this is great, just amend the original commit that
>    introduced it.
> 
>    I am assuming that is fair to implement station and AP support in
>    separated patches, please speak up if this is not the case.
> 
>  2.  PATCH v7 06/12: this should be send as a new separate patch, with a
>      Fixes: tag and Cc:stable.
> 
> > So there should be no patch v8 and only have two patches, one for host
> > mlme and another one to fix hostap restart issue.
> 
> It's ok to have a v8, restarting another series will be even more confusing IMO.
> 

Thanks for your suggestions. I will follow your suggestions to generate following patches.

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Francesco