linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: aic7xxx: fix some problem of return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56b21cd8-7634-895e-6610-2a087ce8fc13@nfschina.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:33:36 +0800
From:   Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc:     hare@...e.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: aic7xxx: fix some problem of return value

On 2023/12/1 15:53, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:59:53AM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
>> v2:
>>   - fix some problems and split v1 patch into this patch set.(Thanks to
>>     Dan)
>>
>> v1:
>>   - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231130024122.1193324-1-suhui@nfschina.com/
>>
> Would have been better with Fixes tags probably.  Otherwise, it looks
> good to me.

Hi, Dan

Sorry for the late reply.

I'm not sure if it's worth to add Fixes tags.
These codes are very old which come from "Linux-2.6.12-rc2".
It's seems like a cleanup or improvement.

Umm, should I send v3 patches to add Fixes tags?

Su Hui