[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fb66471-9131-4990-a622-461f5735120f@suswa.mountain>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:14:59 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
Cc: hare@...e.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: aic7xxx: fix some problem of return value
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 11:33:36AM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> On 2023/12/1 15:53, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:59:53AM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> > > v2:
> > > - fix some problems and split v1 patch into this patch set.(Thanks to
> > > Dan)
> > >
> > > v1:
> > > - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231130024122.1193324-1-suhui@nfschina.com/
> > >
> > Would have been better with Fixes tags probably. Otherwise, it looks
> > good to me.
>
> Hi, Dan
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> I'm not sure if it's worth to add Fixes tags.
> These codes are very old which come from "Linux-2.6.12-rc2".
I know some people use Fixes tags to point to Linux-2.6.12-rc2 but
other people don't like it... Or they didn't like it back in the day,
I'm not sure now.
> It's seems like a cleanup or improvement.
It's definitely a Fix. It affects runtime.
>
> Umm, should I send v3 patches to add Fixes tags?
I don't really care, I guess. Probably yes? Not a lot of people use
aic7xxx these days so from a practical perspective it's not super
important either way.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists