[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f370cc19-719c-49dc-81a1-45a8ec4a6f3e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:02:07 +0100
From: Amadeusz Sławiński
<amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
To: davidgow@...gle.com, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kunit: Add APIs for managing devices
On 12/5/2023 8:31 AM, davidgow@...gle.com wrote:
> Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other
> functions. While it's possible to create these with
> root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this
> is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after,
> for example, a failed assertion.
>
> Add some KUnit-specific functions for registering and unregistering a
> struct device:
> - kunit_device_register()
> - kunit_device_register_with_driver()
> - kunit_device_unregister()
>
> These helpers allocate a on a 'kunit' bus which will either probe the
> driver passed in (kunit_device_register_with_driver), or will create a
> stub driver (kunit_device_register) which is cleaned up on test shutdown.
>
> Devices are automatically unregistered on test shutdown, but can be
> manually unregistered earlier with kunit_device_unregister() in order
> to, for example, test device release code.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 49 +++++++++
> include/kunit/device.h | 76 ++++++++++++++
> lib/kunit/Makefile | 3 +-
> lib/kunit/device.c | 176 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 68 +++++++++++-
> lib/kunit/test.c | 3 +
> 6 files changed, 373 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> index 9db12e91668e..a222a98edceb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> @@ -797,3 +797,52 @@ structures as shown below:
> KUnit is not enabled, or if no test is running in the current task, it will do
> nothing. This compiles down to either a no-op or a static key check, so will
> have a negligible performance impact when no test is running.
> +
> +Managing Fake Devcices and Drivers
> +----------------------------------
Typo: Devices
Powered by blists - more mailing lists