linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET 0/8] perf annotate: Make annotation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2023 16:52:17 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/8] perf annotate: Make annotation_options global (v1)

Em Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:50:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 09:59:02AM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:46 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:37 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > Sgtm. My point wasn't to criticize, I think this is a good change, I
> > > > was just trying to imagine doing things in a way that could overall
> > > > reduce complexity
> 
> > > Yep, thanks for your review.  Can I get your ACKs? :)
> 
> > For the series:
> > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> 
> Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next.


Now trying to fix this:

  CC      bench/numa.o
  CC      tests/hists_cumulate.o
ui/gtk/annotate.c: In function ‘symbol__gtk_annotate’:
ui/gtk/annotate.c:179:43: error: passing argument 3 of ‘symbol__annotate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
  179 |         err = symbol__annotate(ms, evsel, options, NULL);
      |                                           ^~~~~~~
      |                                           |
      |                                           struct annotation_options *
In file included from ui/gtk/annotate.c:5:
/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/util/annotate.h:376:36: note: expected ‘struct arch **’ but argument is of type ‘struct annotation_options *’
  376 |                      struct arch **parch);
      |                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
ui/gtk/annotate.c:179:15: error: too many arguments to function ‘symbol__annotate’
  179 |         err = symbol__annotate(ms, evsel, options, NULL);
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/util/annotate.h:374:5: note: declared here
  374 | int symbol__annotate(struct map_symbol *ms,
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
  CC      tests/python-use.o
  CC      trace/beauty/sockaddr.o
  CC      arch/x86/util/topdown.o
make[6]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/build/Makefile.build:105: ui/gtk/annotate.o] Error 1
make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
  CC      arch/x86/util/machine.o